![]() ![]() Unfortunately, F4 FC don’t play well with Frsky receivers, as they don’t have build-in inverters, and so additional hardware (or DIY hacking) is required for Frsky SBUS, SmartPort and F.Port. ![]() There are two main F4 variants used in FC – F405 and F411.į405 is more powerful but bigger. You normally find this in 30x30mm flight controllers. The F411 used in FC normally has a smaller package but shares the same architecture with F405. However it has lower CPU speed, less flash memory and fewer UART ports, but it’s usually cheaper. The only way to continue seeding would be to store every file I have twice, once for the seed and the other for my library.You normally find this in whoop style FC, 20x20mm or 16x16mm FC. These files are imported via Sonarr/Radarr. My entire array is 112TB, but the problem I have is that once it's imported into the array, the files are moved so the seeding can't resume. I have an unraid server and that 4TB is just my cache drive, this is where all my downloads take place and new files are stored there for 14 days and then they are moved to my HDD array, which I use the Exos 14TB drives, primarily for their 5 year warranty. To be honest I'd seed everything I have for forever if I could, but the way my server is setup I am not sure how unless I build an entirely separate seedbox or something. I would seed for longer, but I haven't figured out a way to do so with my setup. If I had flash caching, my VPN would be the next bottleneck. The max my array can do is about 5MBytes/sec (total) when it's all random pieces (I wish people would do sequential downloads.). And qBittorrent does not work properly with the tracker due to bug #12575 so I can't use SeedingManager (an improper solution even if bug #12575 were resolved). I try to, but like I linked to, there's no software that automates this properly. The folks downloading are happy anyone would purposely seed unpopular torrents. I went for the lowest cost solution (2012 era 3Ware and used HDDs) because my seedbox is paid for with borrowed money. If you want speed, those SSDs are going to cost a lot (until someone adds flash caching to qBt). The point is, you sometimes have to seed a crapload to make use of your bandwidth. There's always 30 to 100 torrents transferring. I seeded about 90TB over the past 10 months with qBt and most transfers are running around 50KBytes/sec. Even consumer HDD would (probably) be usable. Now if flash caching comes to fruition in a bittorrent program, that would take a massive load off of the drive mechanicals. Someone please post another low cost HDD model or series that can take the abuse, as I like having alternatives. Only a few enterprise HDD are worthy (the Toshiba mentioned in the linked thread is the same one I use). Some folks on /r/datahoarder would find arrays like that small, but it can make a big difference on a private tracker.Īs /u/cutt-ly-moths and I discovered, most HDD can't handle seeking 24/7. Aim for at least 60TB air storage, better if 100TB to 200TB. Backblaze's helium stats are useless because the drives aren't very old and not pushed hard. ![]() I've had extremely high failure rates with the ones I bought (HGST, WD). Forgot about large helium drives as they have not yet proven to be reliable. Your 4TB or 8TB drive is not going to help much. This means building a PC with some large storage. With or without that feature, you still need to have torrents be accessible if you want to seed them. Such intelligent seeding prevents torrents from becoming unseeded. Read the following linked post to understand what's missing in all bittorrent programs: It's partly the fault of the developers of bittorrent programs. Seeding takes effort but it shouldn't be as difficult as it is. Many bittorrent users fail to understand this. Generous people seeding (especially long-term seeders) is what makes downloading possible. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |